After I took a few low mag shots of the rear leg of a honeybee I was curious what some of the parts would look like a little "closer up".
It's pretty obvious why they call these the "pollen combs"
And the auricle, part of the "pollen press" in the joint of the basitarsus and tibia, is very interesting when viewed at a little higher magnification. Looks like the perfect tool for the job of crushing and packing pollen. Amazing when you think about it. (Context for the location of this "part" can be seen in the previous "bee's knees" post)
These two shots were taken using a 10X objective, and were illuminated with fiber optic light guides. This is a Nikon Plan, and is the highest mag objective I have that can be illuminated easily from above. Both images are from "stacks" combined using Helicon Focus.
Bee's knees (sort of....) Part II
Moderators: MacroMike, nzmacro, Ken Ramos, twebster, S. Alden
-
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Absolutely amazing!!!
The pollen grains look very beautiful. Do you have any idea what kind of plant this pollen comes from? Maybe canola (Brassica rapa)?
Charlie, I think these pictures are much better than SEM! I find this bee series extremely interesting. My dad's hobby is beekeeping, I'm going to show him your pictures.
The pollen grains look very beautiful. Do you have any idea what kind of plant this pollen comes from? Maybe canola (Brassica rapa)?
Charlie, I think these pictures are much better than SEM! I find this bee series extremely interesting. My dad's hobby is beekeeping, I'm going to show him your pictures.
Piotr
-
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
These are some excellent image Charlie. The detail and color are outstanding. I especially like the 3D effect they have. Thanks and keep up the Bee series if you can. It would be interesting to see more.
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
-
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:17 am
- Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Appreciate the nice comments... . "Stacking" certainly is a new and fun toy ... uhhh.... I mean tool! (I do feel like a kid with a new toy ) Still trying to sort out what subjects work well, and which do not. Also trying to figure out the best lighting and shooting methods. But there is no question that for many static "3D" subjects it's a valuable technique.
Subjects like this were so tough to photograph because you were so limited as to your shooting angle because of DOF reasons. Sometimes the required shooting angle was not the most informative or aesthetic. Viewing with the microscope, you are constantly (and unconsciously) moving focus and assembling a complete "picture" of the subject in your mind. The camera can't do that, and from a "psychological" point of view, seeing a photo with only a very narrow band that is in focus can, at times, be frustrating. So I look at this technique as accomplishing for the camera, the image "assembly" we do mentally by varying the fine focus when observing the specimen.
Subjects like this were so tough to photograph because you were so limited as to your shooting angle because of DOF reasons. Sometimes the required shooting angle was not the most informative or aesthetic. Viewing with the microscope, you are constantly (and unconsciously) moving focus and assembling a complete "picture" of the subject in your mind. The camera can't do that, and from a "psychological" point of view, seeing a photo with only a very narrow band that is in focus can, at times, be frustrating. So I look at this technique as accomplishing for the camera, the image "assembly" we do mentally by varying the fine focus when observing the specimen.
-
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Tom.... yup... basically you take several (many?) photos moving the focus slightly through you subject. You then combine them. Check out this topic:
http://www.photomacrography1.net/forum/ ... php?t=1794
http://www.photomacrography1.net/forum/ ... php?t=1794