
One of my handful of favorite snakes.
captive subject
90mm lens with 2x tc
1/250th second @ f/32
ISO 100
flash as main light
Moderators: MacroMike, nzmacro, Ken Ramos, twebster, S. Alden
Ah, Ken, haven't you been listening to the hardcore environmentalists? That snake had an important role to play! 'Course I have to confess, living up here in the northwest, that I've carefully considered all the roles of rattlesnakes, and concluded that while those roles are really important, they're also very well filled by other more palatable species. So the rattlers and I get along just fine, as long as it doesn't have to be in the same place. Perhaps things work the same in your neck of the woods?Ken Ramos wrote:Hit'm with the lawn mower!
rjlittlefield wrote:while those roles are really important, they're also very well filled by other more palatable species. So the rattlers and I get along just fine, as long as it doesn't have to be in the same place.
That may be a good description in most places, but it didn't work that way in the places that I grew up. In north central Washington, there is competition for both prey and territory between rattlesnakes and bullsnakes. In general, the bullsnakes did better in moister, bushier areas, while the rattlesnakes were mostly restricted to the drier and rockier territory. People prefer water and bushes too, so there was a lot of overlap between bullsnakes and people, but not much between the rattlers and people. We preferred it that way. The bullsnakes were at worst a bit frightening on sudden meetings, before we could tell for sure what they were, while the rattlers could do some serious damage to pets and small children. So the bullsnakes were welcomed to keep the rodents down and make the place less attractive to the rattlers. On those rare occasions when a rattler showed up in the people areas, it was quickly evicted or dispatched. We thought of it as shifting the balance of power.MikeBinOKlahoma wrote:With lone predators like rattlesnakes, there's usually a surplus of predators over available territories. Unless there is a VERY aggressive program of habitat destruction, or some ultra-effective method such as killing the snakes while hibernating in their "caves" in the winter, just killing individuals simply means a different one moves in soon after in most cases.
Mike,MikeBinOKlahoma wrote:Good point. Though you did refer to it, I didn't note your reference to other, more cuddly species. You triggered one of my hot-button lectures, and I didn't fully ponder what you'd said fully.