Lichen on old fence
Moderators: MacroMike, nzmacro, Ken Ramos, twebster, S. Alden
Lichen on old fence
Found this lichen growing on an old fence. The wood was pretty rotten but not wet type of rotten..just very old. Makes for a nice little macro landscape. Cladonia deformis I think....
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda
Canon PowerShot S1 IS with Canon 250D closeup lens
Doug Breda
Canon PowerShot S1 IS with Canon 250D closeup lens
Very nice Doug! Not sure of the scientific name but I have often found these referred to as "Match Stick or British Soldier" lichens.
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Lichen on old fence
Approved. Very attractive lichen.Beetleman wrote: ... Makes for a nice little macro landscape. Cladonia deformis I think...
- MikeBinOKlahoma
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Umm....Could it be Oklahoma?
Doug & Mike
Just done a search and it's evidently Cladonia cristatella See:-
http://www.gloriamundipress.com/lichens ... atella.htm
DaveW
Just done a search and it's evidently Cladonia cristatella See:-
http://www.gloriamundipress.com/lichens ... atella.htm
DaveW
Dave W, an interesting link. Not extensive as far as lichens go but one good enough to identify the most commonly encountered species. Lichens are extremely hard to identify sometimes. I find them to be somewhat interesting but I do not research them or study them very much, not being particularly interested in lichenology. I happen to have a book on on them, however, that is quite informative "Lichens" by William Purvis. It's a small book, paperback, that really gives one a good introduction to these forms of life and it is fairly easy reading being that it trys to employ laymans terms instead of confusing one with scientific taxonmical jargon which will make most individuals lay a book down without further reading unless they are well versed in such things that do employ scientific taxons.
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
MacroLuv wrote:
I am not good at this but it may be that it belongs to the same family, just a different species within it. If you notice C. deformis is more cup shaped where as C. cristatella is cup shaped but to a lesser degree and is more branching. To get really into this we might could argue that this could be C. floerkeana but I suppose we won't. Here is a quote from "Lichens" by William Purvis, you will see what I mean.I always thought about "cristata" as another form of the same species.
I often use this taxonomical ploy when I am not sure of a species but of its Order, Sub order, or family i.e. Caldonia spp. (spp=meaning many species)"Cladonia is a large genus containing several hundred species and probably the first group of lichens beginners learn to recognize. They're morphologically variable, having subtle differences in their patterns of branching, cup shape, lack of cups, or the size of soredia coating the cups. Quite difficult to name or place to a species level, especially for those lacking cups, without first carrying out chemical studies."
Last edited by Ken Ramos on Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
MacroLuv
The specific epithet is "cristatella" not "cristata" which presumably indicates it is like or similar to a true cristate. Though looking like a cristate would normally have the epithet "cristatoides" I think, without looking up Stearns Botanical Latin?.
Being a cactophile we encounter many cristates as the family seems quite prone to them. These are plants where what would be the normal growing point develops in a line causing fan shaped, often convoluted growth.
Cristates are just one form of abnormal growth or monstrosity. The epithet "monstrosa" is usually reserved for multiple or excessive growing points producing abnormal branching, in the case of cacti from almost every areole.
DaveW
The specific epithet is "cristatella" not "cristata" which presumably indicates it is like or similar to a true cristate. Though looking like a cristate would normally have the epithet "cristatoides" I think, without looking up Stearns Botanical Latin?.
Being a cactophile we encounter many cristates as the family seems quite prone to them. These are plants where what would be the normal growing point develops in a line causing fan shaped, often convoluted growth.
Cristates are just one form of abnormal growth or monstrosity. The epithet "monstrosa" is usually reserved for multiple or excessive growing points producing abnormal branching, in the case of cacti from almost every areole.
DaveW
You know I find posts like this interesting and amusing to a point. You never seem to know when a particular photograph can stir up a little controversy in discussion. Hey Doug!...ever feel you've started a "range war?" Good posts guys!
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
"(spp=meaning many species)"
Ken
People should be careful not to mix up your spp. (= a number of species) with ssp. (= subspecies).
The designation subspecies has now replaced the old infraspecific ranks of variety (= var.), form (= f. or fma.) etc in both Botany and Zoology.
For instance in the Cactaceae the former Mammillaria rubrograndis on being reduced to an infraspecific category under Mammillaria melanocentra is now written as:-
Mammillaria melanocentra ssp. rubrograndis
The correct way to render botanical and zoological names is with the generic name capitalised, but specific and subspecific names, wether named after a person or not, in lower case letters. The name should also be in italics as above, according the the IOBN Code as I understand it.
No doubt somebody will correct me if I am wrong because it is hard for the amateur to keep up with regular variations to the code of the International Organisation for Botanical Nomenclature (IOBN).
Dave Whiteley
Ken
People should be careful not to mix up your spp. (= a number of species) with ssp. (= subspecies).
The designation subspecies has now replaced the old infraspecific ranks of variety (= var.), form (= f. or fma.) etc in both Botany and Zoology.
For instance in the Cactaceae the former Mammillaria rubrograndis on being reduced to an infraspecific category under Mammillaria melanocentra is now written as:-
Mammillaria melanocentra ssp. rubrograndis
The correct way to render botanical and zoological names is with the generic name capitalised, but specific and subspecific names, wether named after a person or not, in lower case letters. The name should also be in italics as above, according the the IOBN Code as I understand it.
No doubt somebody will correct me if I am wrong because it is hard for the amateur to keep up with regular variations to the code of the International Organisation for Botanical Nomenclature (IOBN).
Dave Whiteley
MaroLuv replied :
Maybe so Nikola but Dave brought out an interesting point that I was not aware of, however, I am not well versed in botony and my primary interest lie in Protozoology and Mycology (Plasmodial Slime Molds to be more specific) Although study and research on Plasmodial Slime Molds (Myxomycetes) is usually carried out by botonists or so I have read. It seems odd that they are not researched more by mycologists and zoologist since they are both animal and fungi.Huh... This is going to be one long-term discussion.
Site Admin.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.
Kenneth Ramos
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Kens Microscopy
Reposts of my images within the galleries are welcome, as are constructive critical critiques.